PDA

View Full Version : New charges against ex-Blackwater workers in Iraq shootings that killed 17



Brian
10-18-2013, 09:25
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department on Thursday brought fresh charges against four former Blackwater Worldwide security contractors, resurrecting an internationally charged case over a deadly 2007 shooting on the streets of Baghdad.


A new grand jury indictment charges the men, who were hired to guard U.S. diplomats, in a shooting that inflamed anti-American sentiment abroad and heightened diplomatic sensitivities amid an ongoing war.


The guards are accused of opening fire in busy Nisoor Square on Sept. 16, 2007. Seventeen Iraqi civilians died, including women and children. Prosecutors say the heavily armed Blackwater convoy launched an unprovoked attack using sniper fire, machine guns and grenade launchers. Defense lawyers argue their clients are innocent men who were ambushed by Iraqi insurgents.


The guards were charged with manslaughter and weapons violations in 2008, but a federal judge the following year dismissed the case, ruling the Justice Department withheld evidence from a grand jury and violated the guards' constitutional rights. The dismissal outraged many Iraqis, who said it showed Americans considered themselves above the law. Vice President Joe Biden, speaking in Baghdad in 2010, expressed his "personal regret" for the shootings in declaring that the U.S. would appeal the court decision.


A federal appeals court reinstated the case in 2011, saying now-retired Judge Ricardo Urbina had wrongly interpreted the law. Prosecutors again presented evidence before a grand jury, and U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth gave the Justice Department until Monday to decide what to do with the case.


The defendants include Dustin Heard, a former U.S. Marine; Evan Liberty, a former U.S. Marine; Nick Slatten, a former U.S. Army sergeant; and Paul Slough, a U.S. Army veteran.


Slatten is charged with 14 counts of voluntary manslaughter and 16 counts of attempt to commit manslaughter; Liberty and Heard are charged with 13 counts of voluntary manslaughter and 16 counts of attempt to commit manslaughter; and Slough is charged with 13 counts of voluntary manslaughter and 18 counts of attempt to commit manslaughter. All four were also charged with one count of using and discharging a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence.


The men face lengthy prison sentences if convicted.


The defendants are charged under the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act, a statute that allows the government to prosecute certain government employees and military contractors for crimes committed overseas. Defense lawyers have argued that the statute does not apply in this case since the guards were working as State Department contractors, not for the military.


Heard's lawyer, David Schertler, said in an email that he was disappointed with the prosecution, which he believes has no merit.


"We will continue to fight and defend Dustin Heard's innocence and honor until he is fully exonerated," he said.


Lawyers for Slough and Slatten declined to comment. Liberty's lawyer had no immediate comment Thursday.


In a statement, U.S. Attorney Ronald Machen. said the prosecution "demonstrates our commitment to upholding the rule of law even in times of war and to bringing justice to the memories of those innocent men, women and children who were gunned down in Baghdad more than six years ago."


Prosecutors last month agreed to dismiss their case against a fifth guard, Donald Ball, a retired Marine. A sixth guard, Jeremy Ridgeway, pleaded guilty and is awaiting sentencing.


The Justice Department had earlier dropped Slatten from the case, but after the appeals court decision revived the prosecution, the government contended that he remained a defendant.


The company formerly known as Blackwater Worldwide is under new ownership and is now headquartered in Virginia. It had changed its name to Xe Services, but the company was sold to a group of investors who then changed the name to Academi. Blackwater founder Erik Prince is no longer affiliated with the company.


In moving forward with the case, the government will seek to overcome some of the legal problems that have dogged the prosecution.


The case initially ran into trouble because the State Department promised the guards that their statements explaining what happened would not be used in a criminal case. The guards told investigators that they fired their weapons, a crucial admission because forensic evidence could not determine who fired.


Because of a limited immunity deal, prosecutors had to build their case without those statements, a high legal hurdle. In dismissing the case, Urbina said prosecutors had read the statements, reviewed them in the investigation and used them to question witnesses and get search warrants.


Court documents also reveal conflicting evidence, with some witnesses saying the Blackwater convoy was under fire and others saying it was not. Some said the entire convoy fired into the intersection; others said only a few men opened fire.

http://www.stripes.com/news/us/new-charges-against-ex-blackwater-workers-in-iraq-shootings-that-killed-17-1.247650

BigFreeze99
10-18-2013, 16:18
There is always more to the story than what is released to/by the press.....

Brian
10-18-2013, 17:31
For sure. A bunch of know that when bullets are flying you will never get the same story even from 2 guys that were next to each other the whole time. Tho DOD and our government should learn a lesson from this but they won't and they will continue to employ private companies to help fight a war that our uniformed services are undermanned, underfunded, and underprepared for. Thank you democrat budget cuts. I wasn't old enough to see the Clinton era completely change our military but I feel that is what we are going through now.


Sent from my Honey Badger of an iPhone

comanche_warior
10-19-2013, 13:47
With the way the world is situated right now its almost idiotic to keep reducing the military, pretty soon we will be using sharp sticks. I agree with you brian we need to quit privatizing the military or we will end up shooting ourselves in the foot here.

Gunnut88
10-20-2013, 09:07
As I remember this was not an unprovoked attack. They were taking fire from rooftops as well as from the crowd and all avenues of retreat were cut off. I could be wrong but that is what I remember hearing. If the politicians would let us do our fucking job we would not need these PMC's and we would mop the floor with the haji's.

Rudquist
10-20-2013, 11:38
With the way the world is situated right now its almost idiotic to keep reducing the military, pretty soon we will be using sharp sticks. I agree with you brian we need to quit privatizing the military or we will end up shooting ourselves in the foot here.

Politics is what got us sending contractors into Iraq. It looked good to say that we were only sending so many "Military" men and women. Fully two-thirds of combat forces in Iraq were private contractors that our esteemed leaders never mentioned to the public. I won't even go into the 'other civilians' adding to the cost. I still broil inside when I remember congress and Rumsfeld (civilians) ignoring General Shinseki's counsel that we needed 3X the number of troops then those planned. Look where it got us. Not enough troops to secure and patrol after the war-fighting was over. As for privatizing the military, latest figures puts even the most conservative estimates at double the amount of money than if the military did the jobs themselves; as was the case before 'out-sourcing' was introduced. After Vietnam, the military struggled and finally succeeded in getting the politicians hands out of "target-picking"; however, that also got overturned in one fell swoop just before the war.

Land wars could be possible again in Korea, China, or Russia. Unlikely though. Proxy wars in Africa are most likely. Korean unification is the song. China and Russia consolidating their control on resources might bump heads. Right now, DoD could still keep much of it's force by cutting the fat; i.e., cut loose the contractors and go back to in-house. As for Blackwater; XE; or whatever they choose to call themselves, that they get an exclusive contract to guard our State Department is, IMHO, blasphemous to the military.

Since no officer was charged in the Abu Gharib scandal (Officers are ultimately responsible for everything that their soldiers do or do not do; and to say that they were 'unaware' should have been grounds for charges right there), then why should the Blackwater men be charged again? Or at all? 2007 was a time when RoE was extremely loose, and if you were fired upon you opened up.

What is the political reason for dredging this back up? (why is it being done by the politicians?) That is what I wonder.